Business and Tech Links and Notes #3

January 6, 2010

1-6-10

1. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRLrsdwRkcB4&pos=1

“ADP Says U.S. Companies Cut Estimated 84,000 Jobs (Update2)”

This is not encouraging news. I know some news agencies may try to spin this as positive news, considering fewer jobs were lost lately than in previous months of the recession. But this shows economic upturn only to corporations, if anyone at all. Consumer spending will still fall, because more people are going to be out of work and be unable to afford as many goods. 10.1% is a horrible unemployment rate for the United States; until it drops to about 7-8%, enough that noticeable change is happening to the average person, I do not think people on Main Street will have increasing confidence in our economy.

2. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aWj75b2VIbn8&pos=5

“Intel Vulnerable as Consumers Shift to Phones to Browse the Web”

I really do not think Intel has a lot to worry about here. It is true that handheld devices are skyrocketing in popularity, but these devices have not the same, exact capabilities of PCs yet. For example, I have yet to see a handheld device where you could reliably use MS Office or something similar. If such a handheld device exists that has any functionality with such programs at all, one certainly cannot efficiently type papers and spreadsheets with it. Moreover, I have yet to see handheld devices that can play high-end video games (e.g. World of Warcraft) or use high-end applications (e.g. Photoshop). Even if handheld devices get browsing dominance and even if there are major advances in cloud computing, I still think handheld devices have a long way to go to be able to have dominance over all computing tasks.

3. http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/04/china-consumer-marketing-leadership-managing-rein.html

“How To Sell To The Chinese in 2010”

I kind of agree with the idea that the Chinese will pay for safe, quality products, but only to an extent. Like someone in the comments section of the article said, it all depends on if the consumers can afford higher quality goods. There is a high percentage of impoverished Chinese who can barely afford the basic necessities of life, and when they buy anything at all, they have to buy whatever they can afford. I do believe the more Americanized, affluent Chinese buy premium foreign goods when they can, but that does not help those who cannot afford those goods.

4. http://www.entrepreneur.com/franchises/franchisingyourbusinesscolumnistmarksiebert/article204188.html

“The Dangers of Do-It-Yourself Franchising”

This article just seemed like common sense to me. The moral of the story is simply that an entrepreneur should not attempt tasks that he or she is not qualified to undertake. Furthermore, failing these tasks could have grave circumstances. Are many entrepreneurs really that short-sighted? It just seems obvious to me that someone should leave some parts of expanding a business to professionals who have experience in averting financial and legal disasters. There are some tasks that cannot be done on a “learn as you go” basis, because a single mistake can be way too costly.

5. http://www.entrepreneur.com/money/financing/venturecapital/article204198.html

“4 Common Venture Capital Myths”

I do not know much at all about the ins and outs of raising venture capital, so this was a good article for me to read. I know that it is very difficult to get venture capital and that companies will try many other ways to raise capital before resorting to that, simply due to how difficult it is to get. It makes sense to me that venture capitalists will want significant control over the company, since their money is just as much on the line as that of the founders and investors. It also just makes sense that any venture capital is good venture capital, regardless of how much and from whom, since money is the most important thing to a business.

6. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10426368-17.html?tag=newsLatestHeadlinesArea.0

“Nielsen: You sure have a lot of TVs”

I was not surprised in the least to hear that so many people have four or more TVs in their households. We live in a society where people nearly worship television. What I found to be a far more interesting part of the article was the mention of how the newest technology is infiltrating the mainstream, while people still watch the overwhelming majority of their video media on television. My belief is that video media technology will further consolidate to the point that one day, not in the too distant future, the average person will tune into their integrated media set, and be able to watch online videos as well as television media in a smooth, seamless fashion. Obviously, one who is technologically savvy can already watch YouTube with the help of a PlayStation3, but I am thinking about something much simpler.

7. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10425553-17.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0

“First dedicated 3D networks coming to TV”

This is the worst idea I have heard in a long time. Seriously, why would anyone actually pay money for this? There may be a few people who think this is an interesting idea and would like to maybe watch a few shows with 3D glasses, but I cannot see people willing to shell out significant amounts of money to pay for such a gimmick. Once 3D technology gets to the hologram stage, people may be more inclined to spend money on that, but even then, I have my doubts.

Advertisements